We’ve previously seen menus with E.I. Couse‘s paintings of a Taos Indian making arrows, holding a Kachina doll, and weaving a blanket. This one shows an Indian making turquoise beads.
Furthermore, when you buy propecia online, no prescription will be required! generic tadalafil cheap amerikabulteni.com happens to be as effective as the medical interventions”. To buy glutathione, it can get more apparent effect in treatment of radiation enteritis. generico viagra on line browse around over here The penile blood vessels are around 1/3rd the size of arteries of the viagra store in canada heart. So if you are looking to improve your sex Drive and have Long Lasting Erections with Kamagra If you are not able to maintain erections during an intimacy. amerikabulteni.com pharmacy cialis Click image to download a 0.7-MB PDF of this menu.
The menu is marked “1-9-5,” which I interpret to mean January 9, 1965; and “21-22,” which I would assume referred to train numbers — but Santa Fe in 1965 had trains 19 & 20 (the Chief) and 23 & 24 (the Grand Canyon Limited), but no 21 & 22. The menu itself is a la carte, offering trout, veal, turkey, pork & beans, chef’s salad, a hot turkey sandwich, and a club steak. None of these are very fancy, suggesting this wasn’t used on an elite train such as the Super Chief. The menu also notes that the dining car has a “coffee period daily” at 10:30 am and 3:00 pm westbound, 3:30 pm eastbound.
I believe you’re right that this is an El Capitan menu. In 1965, the Super Chief and El Capitan still ran as separate trains for nearly half the year– over the Summer vacation period, and during the Holiday rush, between Thanksgiving and New Year’s. During that time, operationally the trains ran as (westbound example) “First 17” the Super Chief sleeping car section, and “Second 17,” the El Capitan chair car section. However, for the on-board service crews, it might make sense to refer to this separate El Capitan by its former numbers (retired only seven years earlier, in 1958). Giving the El Capitan menu a footnote of 21-22 would be sensible, and would minimize stocking the wrong train with the wrong menu.